Let me put
it this way. Last style assignment, One
Hit. Sixteen misses. The misses showed the following trends:
- Tone
changes, often none in selected style
- Run-ons (hint: all those “ands” – take them out, break up the lines, restructure)
- Where’s the product (this is a course on ad writing, not writing writing)
- The answer to most writing problems is structure (hints: try reversing order of clauses, mixing up order of information from para to para, then attack those lines for Copy Sins, readability, tone, etc.)
- What did you mean to say? (Sometimes the writing is so disorganized and/or product free, I have no idea what it’s supposed to be about)
- How is this writing in any way/shape/form written in/to reflect the selected style? One or two words do not a Style make. The entire piece should reflect the era you’re trying to use. Still not sure? See the one hit, which I’ve put at the end, compare it with what you did. If you still don’t get it, we can talk Thursday.
It’s the last one that surprised me the most. An assignment
requiring me to live in someone else’s skin, to speak someone else’s language –
the discovery of all the clichés and truths to spoof, warm and dress up often
boring features and benefits – how much fun is that! I thought this would be a less expected way to
stretch and challenge you as writers. I
tried to inspire. Guess it’s time to
talk process.
There is a
process. It’s not necessarily my
process. It’s not necessarily a process
you should emulate. It’s just one way of doing it you can try, see if it helps,
makes your life easier. What does the
process do? Hopefully, it’ll give you
what you need to take another, completely unrelated shot at it. This isn’t your expected rewrite – you still
must rewrite last week’s assignment (and do a better rewrite on what you handed
in last week).
Keep in mind we are retro-fitting
this assignment. You normally wouldn’t
be looking at a few styles, choosing one, then bending everything else in the
name of whatever era/sociological phenom you decided on. No, normally you’d be doing your input,
writing your KCWP, concepting from the KCWP (and especially the KKF), then
writing in the appropriate voice/Language of Concept. This time, however, we start at the end and
move foreward.
Pick a style from last week's list. Do yourself a favor and choose one you either
know a great deal about (first hand is good), have a special interest in or
have special access to relevant insights. When I say relevant, I don’t mean
Wikipedia. DIG. Art, lit, fashion, history, the whole
magilla. The more you know, the better
it’ll be. Always loved big band music, the intensity of
WWII, the lonely freedom women gained so long as the men were on the front? Did you wish you were there to march with
Susan B. Anthony or Margaret Sanger? Be one
of those cool cat poets on the podium as part of the Beat underground? Here’s your chance.
- Got your Style? What Prospect does it speak most strongly to? Does it touch a certain prospect’s fantasy life? Another’s patriotism? Glory Days? Look deep into your style, then retrofit your prospect from those it speaks to.
- Take one more step. What product/service might your prospect
desire/be motivated by Style to consider differently than before?
- Learn everything there is about the language,
look, attitudes, heroes, music, comedy, everything held in the style’s/decade’s
cosmic conscious. Use this to feed
your growing expression of your chosen style verbally, with pushed structure
and occasional risks, talking about product to customers, sales staff,
C-level managers and all? Go
vintage clothes shopping, try on period pieces, put yourself into the
style in every way possible.
- Don’t write an ad. Write something else, something bigger,
something carried by style but not buried by it. However you pair your style with your
prospect, however you integrate your product, keep reminding yourself
you’re not you. You’re Al Capone,
one of Hendrix’s groupies. Tears
are falling as you wave your hubby good-byeas he leaves for
to fight the Hun. You can out-disco
Travolta. Put yourself into the
style, even if you have to play dress-up to do it.
- Edit Edit Edit.
Look up some terms in a
slang dictionary, then edit it some more.
That reason your 30s era flapper would buy the product? Make sure it corresponds to the today’s
modern reader, yet keeps her soundly in the roaring twenties.
LAST WEEK’S GREATEST
HIT
Headline:
She came in like a light draft on
Sunday morning. Another dame in distress. But then came her scent.
That smell,
while it paralyzed me, floated through
the room and breathed life into this dank stale office of mine.
She told me the particulars of her case. I didn’t hear a word
of it. I said yes anyway, nodding like the fool I am.
“What do I call ya?” I asked. Getting up to leave, she turned
back to say, “Mademoiselle.” Like that,
she was gone. *Her scent still lingering.
CHANEL Coco Mademoiselle
A true femme
fatale.
*My one
suggested edit, “The memory of her
scent still lingering.”
As an aside, I apologize for the
lateness of this post. Yesterday was
technical problem Monday – I wrote it Sunday, was going to do final edit
yesterday, the document was nowhere to be found. Learned quite a bit about
Windows and PCs (mainly I want my Mac back), then gave up and tried to
re-create it this morning. Not your
fault – this assignment – do your normal edits + write one more ad w/style from
your choice of last week’s list, as long as it’s not in the same decade
(EX: You did a 50s Happy Days before,
you can’t do the 50s Beats this time.
Use another era.)
Because I’m late with this, you have
the option of our going over your continuing rewrites this next Skype go-round
and moving the deadline for this assignment to 5 pm Friday. I'll go over it, send it back, then we can discuss next week. If it’s not in my inbox by 5 pm Thursday, you will not
be given credit for the assignment.
As usual, (c) 2013 Doreen Dvorin/Kamikaze Creative
I OWE AN APOLOGY TO A MEMBER OF THIS CLASS. A SECOND STUDENT HAD NAILED HER STYLE, WWII PROPOGANDA, THEN WHEN I WENT OVER IT AGAIN, I FOUND A WORD OR TWO I THOUGHT COULD BE IMPROVED UPON. ACTUALLY, TWO PEOPLE NAILED THE STYLE. SORRY TO HAVE MISINFORMED YOU, SORRY NOT TO HAVE GIVEN CREDIT WHERE CREDIT IS DUE.
ReplyDelete