Monday, April 16, 2012

TIPS, CLUES, EDITS, THOUGHTS: More on Headlines, but these work in Body Copy, too.


Ad copy (headlines are ad copy, as far as I’m concerned) is such a big subject.  I’m still learning new things.  Sometimes it’s because we must adapt/expand for new mediums, advertising styles/trends, stylebook and semantic changes, new dictionary entries, yadda yadda.  Other times because the more I do, the more I push, the more I try, the more I innovate. 

These tips have always worked for me.  Every tip might not apply to every job, but most are general and apply across the spectrum.  Some aren’t new.  My students have been carried most forward by teaching students of their own.  Some will be put in context as this course progresses.  Others may appear only here, this once.  At the end, I may share a few “assignments” I’ve given to my classes.  Consider them exercises in Kamikaze Thinking, Writing, Doing.  Do them/use them or not, up to you.  If you do, I’d love to hear how it works for you.

Tip #1:  Write Short.  This applies to headlines, subheads, body copy.  Even when you write long copy, even when a long headline is appropriate, it must read short.  Here are a few things to help you turn too long lines into something more actionable.
·      Read it out loud.  Develop your ear, you’ll soon start to “hear” the edits
·      Change word order.  Play with it many different ways.  Should point to the easy edits
·      Get rid of prepositions.  Xing out all the “ofs” “tos” “bys” etc. will show you how it can be made shorter.  Sometimes it’s an easy fix, sometimes you have to operate on your structure.  Either way, axing prepositions point the way to short/shorter
·      Get rid of modifiers.  Find one word/word picture (think writing visually) for the whole lot of them.  Easier than you think
·      Ing-ing.  Using ing on your verbs is an easy way to get rid of passive voice, prepositions and a host of other Copy Sins.  It can also help you clarify structure
·      Keep it active.  Active voice is the most word-thrifty you can use.  It’s also the most compelling.  Unless you’re talking about something that happened in the past, keep it active.  Even if you are talking about results that happened in the past – play with it until you find a way to make that active, too
·      Write advertising Haiku.  Not limericks – they’re too easy.  Haiku are not only short, they’re visual and active, even without verbs.  Next job, try putting it in Haiku.  You may not keep it there, but you’ll be amazed where it takes you

Tip #2:  Think punctuation.  Don’t let your AD/GD/CD/whomever stick a period at the end of your headline because it’s the end of your headline.  Periods are stops (one of the few things David Ogilvy and I agree on).  If you want to make a strong statement, end the thought at the end of your headline, use one.  Period.  If you want the line to lead into your visual/body copy/et. al., want its idea to linger in the prospect's mind, don’t.   Don’t be afraid of question marks (or questions) in headlines.  Just don’t get in the habit.  Don’t think every question takes a ?  Some - rhetorical or not - are beter with periods.  Honest. 

Commas are stops (pauses, really), too.  Try using structure to eliminate them.  If you can’t, use headline line breaks in your headline to fake them  (see how eliminating that preposition shortened that line/sped it up?  Just to keep you thinking).

Tip #3:  Line breaks have to do with meaning and flow, never graphics.  Never let your AD/GD break up a longer headline for you.  He/she may think it looks better, but it can change/confuse the meaning of your headline.  EX:
1) The small brown dog leapt over the hairy red fox.
2) The small
     brown dog leapt
     over the hairy
     red fox.  (Not only did those breaks confuse things, that kind of over-stacked headline cuts down readability/readership.)
3)  The small brown
     dog leapt over the
     red hairy dog.  (Not much better, is it.)
4) The small brown dog leapt
     over the hairy red fox.  (The best so far.)
5) The small dog leapt over
      the hairy red fox.  (Best of the bunch, although I could go either way in a pinch)

Tip #4:  Write short paragraphs.  Even if they add up to more space, people read them as shorter overall.  Long paragraphs also look more confusing – read that way, too.  That sold block of type is so uninviting, most readers become exhausted just looking at them.  Don’t read that paragraph – or any after.  EX:  Same number of words.  Same number of sentences.  Which do you want to read?
A:
Yadda yadda yadda yadda.  Yadda
yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda
yadda yadda yadda yadda.  Yadda
 yadda.  Yadda yadda yadda yadda
yadda yadda.  Yadda yadda yadda yadda
 yadda. Yadda yadda yadda yadda.
Yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda
yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda.  Yadda
 yadda.  Yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda.
Yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda.

B:
Yadda yadda yadda yadda.
Yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda
yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda. 
Yadda yadda.

Yadda yadda yadda yadda
yadda yadda.  Yadda yadda
yadda yadda yadda. Yadda yadda
 yadda yadda.

Yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda
yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda.
Yadda yadda.  Yadda yadda
 yadda yadda yadda yadda. 
Yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda.
 

Tip #5:  KISS.  A cliché, but Keep It Simple Stupid.  The more simple the line.  The more simple the way it’s treated graphically.  The easier it is to remember, the more it’ll get read.

Tip #6:  Innovate.  All rules are made to be broken, even mine.  The trick: you have to be an expert at using the rules to intuit what you can get away with without losing your reader.  The CD, client, AE, etc. are another story (how you present, how well you broke the rules come into big play here, along with politics, who’s wife was an English major, agency creative perspective, brand voice/stylebook, etc.).  Since we’re doing Prospect Centered work, really, the prospect is the only one who matters.  Do it right, do it in the right language of concept, with the right message – the prospect, at least, probably won’t even notice.

Hope these help.  Wow.  Two posts in two days.  What am I gonna do for an encore?

Saturday, April 14, 2012

KAMIKAZE COPYWRITING COURSE/LESSON 1: WRITING HEADLINES. Good friend Betty Gammage, former student, PC grad, Creative Circus co-founder says I’m good at explaining specific How to Do. It’s hard to explain how to “do” headlines without classroom give and take, but here goes.


*** While I’ve tried to help you grok the relationship between the Kamikaze Key Fact and Creative Concept, I really haven’t said much about How To Concept.  Some good books cover it (the new edition of Hey Whipple, Squeeze This, for example), so I’ll assume you have your KCWP (Kamikaze Creative Work Plan) written, pushed and concepts ready. 

I mention Concept here only as part of my Process.  Concept is a many layered, complex thing integral to the headline process.  Don’t think you can go right into writing headlines without it.  Doesn’t work that way.

Headlines pop up concepting, but there’s a big difference between a concept and a headline (clue: reread Concept vs. Illustration).  This is about headline process - my process.  Knowing the mechanics of what I do may help you discover, refine, redefine yours.  Hopefully you’ll find practical tips, insights, inspiration you can use.   If your process isn’t exactly like mine, you’re not necessarily doing it wrong (unless you skip the part about the 10-12 pages).

I start where I always start.  The Lexis/Nexis of every creative assignment, the Kamikaze Creative Work Plan.  I add whatever product info I’ve gathered, emails, notes, competitive facts, random thoughts I’ve already written down, etc.  The flotsam and jetsam of Prospect knowledge.

Once my partner and I decide which (four, five, ten or more) concepts (not ads – concepts) we want to play with, I start Running Lines.  I do mean lines, plural to point Overkill.  At least ten-twelve pages (single spaced) for each idea. 

I write down every line my partner and I spit out tossing around ideas.  Sometimes these “concept” lines turn into headlines.  Sometimes subs.  Sometimes random scraps of body copy.  Sometimes just scraps for recycling.  I save them all, as I won’t know what they are before I push, pull, re-imagine and grind them out until I should have bottomed out – then push out more.

My process uses markers and that beautiful, expensive tracing paper agencies supplied when we hand drew comps.  I’m addicted – markers glide, letters flow - so do ideas.  Some writers use pencils, pens, note pads, binders, composition books, crayons, laptops.  Whatever works for you.

There are no words in my head when I write.  Many writers do.  No right or wrong, just mine, yours.  I see images, colors, nothing that makes sense.  They only turn into words when they come out my fingers.  Until then, it’s just – stuff.

I start headlines by writing what I call positioning lines.  Not even close to anything you could use, they plainly state what I want to say.  I run as many of those through my concept, Prospect and partner as relate.  These help me Translate the Thought.

This isn’t about thesaurus synonyms.  I ignore the words.  For a headline to be conceptual, do more than parrot your strategy, you must show the thought behind the line.  Thought translation starts there.

What does “Translate the Thought” look like?  What does it do?  It turns “I hate sitting in traffic” into something the concept and prospect could agree on -  “I know why birds fly,” maybe.  “Gas guzzling” might translate into “eating dead dinosaurs.”

Well translated thoughts are visual – you see them.  Not because they’re loaded with descriptors, because they engage prospects, speak in the language of concept.  Make them participants, no just readers. 

As I progress, translations get better, with some real stinkers – wild hair lines, really – mixed in.  Don’t self-edit.  Those stinkers can point you in new, exciting directions later. 

It may not feel like it 3:00 the morning of internal presentations, but there’s no such thing as one great line per thought.  When things seem to have run their course (i.e., nothing new, I’m thinking dinner), I take all the papers off the floor (good days, they can be knee deep), pile them in groups and copy them on lined paper.  Not all – just those I think have potential.  I keep the rest to mine for inspiration if/when I come up dry working this first bunch.

I group various versions of the same line, single-spaced.  Skip a few lines, put wild hairs and singles by themselves.  Order thought progressions so I can see how they developed.

The lined paper list (which has usually grown in the transfer) goes into the Mac, adding more lines, twists, progressions, word/order changes, etc.  I don’t worry about caps, punctuation, spelling, correctness.  Just key them in, watch them grow.  

Each step, lines become more Prospect Centered.  Get closer to the final language of concept that’ll become the style my body copy takes.  Speak more directly to the heart of the Prospect. 

Sometimes I veer off strategy.  Sometimes, I push it.  Sometimes the line/thoughts differ enough to present two strategies, let others help decide.  If the strategy changes, I start over.  Good strategy, bad lines?  Keep the strategy, put the lines aside.  I read every line out loud, or have someone else do it. I need to hear the lines, not just read them.

Many copywriters’ headlines are always good, but rarely brilliant.  They run lines until they get one they like, stop there or work until they have three equally acceptable headlines their partner agrees to comp.  These writers offer a preliminary page or two of lines that stop at the ones they settled on.  Many are variations of the same line.  One uses “the,” another “a”; the same words get scrambled into different orders; maybe one word changes.  Still the same line.  Not a bad exercise, but if the root doesn’t pass, it’s always back to square one.

If something totally off the wall shows up, they rarely run it to pages of variations.  Too often it dies:  If there’s an odd line out, there must be something wrong with it!

Had they kept at it, the lines might do a 180, change tone, emphasis, approach.  Then twist, turn into several pages of something else.  You never know where a great line comes from, where it starts (beyond a smart, creative KCWP), where it’ll take you before it ends up at “One Show!” 

All those extensions of the same line, twists turns, wild hairs too many people ignore can lead straight to Cannes, NYC, London, LA.  Where do you want to go?  Follow those lines, even if they take you to the trash.  You’ll never know until you do.

Sure, genius may show up in body copy or when you’re fooling around, trying to get started.  But when all is said, written, edited, kept and/or rejected, you can’t pick the real gems without running every line as far as it’ll go.  (ADs, GDs, WDs, don’t let your partner get away with too few lines.  Even if you have to pull each new line out of them, don’t settle.  It’s your book, too.  It’s as much your responsibility to demand great headlines as it’s your writer’s responsibility to demand great graphics.)

Sometimes your first line is the best.  But how do you know if you haven’t run as many as you can, as far you can?  If you don’t follow wild word combos that make you wince, but hide true brilliance, to evolve?  Especially since after the first half-dozen or so pages, a writer often can’t tell which lines are good, which stink, which foretell genius down the road.

Your partner, ACD, CD, best copy friend are invaluable.  Even if they can’t write a great headline to save their job.  They see what you can’t.  You may disagree, but they can make an excellent point you miss.  Add that perfect bit you’ve been struggling to find.  An important note:  Don’t throw anything out.  You may need your pile of rejects when you present to your CD or even to the client.

Working alone, I print out the list onto a different color paper, in a totally different font.  Anything to make it look fresh, new. I take walks, ride the elevator, go to a movie, talk about anything else.  It’s important to put spaces between you and all that work, so you can actually read it, taste it, feel it.  If you don’t, it’ll all sound so familiar you’ll skip over words, lines, thinking you know what they say.  Then later, have to ask your partner to reset the headline because you missed a typo, forgot to edit out, add/subtract a word or three.

If I’m in house, desperate for distance from the familiar, need to spark something new, I may go out to my car, blast music, dance in my seat.  At home, I play music LOUD (Latin, Big Band, Leonard Cohen, Maria Callas, Jonathan Richman, Ima Sumac, Zappa – anything different, unexpected, fun).  Bang my conga drums.  Stuck in a cubicle, I play with office toys, count ceiling tiles, do yoga  (moving always seems to help), make faces out the window, down the hall.

Whatever I do – even if it’s just five minutes’ worth – I don’t think lines.  CA isn’t far enough away for this kind of thought divorce.  Crossword puzzles, Sudoku, meditation are.  Anything that distracts, helps you relax.

Everything will look new when you come back.  You’ll see things you missed.  Lines you hated then, show promise now.  Lines you once loved are now embarrassing (don’t fall so in love with a line you can’t weed it out later).  Showing your work to someone else helps, but hitting the refresh button in your process first takes off your blinders, turns you around so you let go of where you started, actually hear what they say.

Not everyone needs conga drums to keep words flowing.  But we all need spaces between our thoughts to let great lines happen  (it’s the third stage of the Creative Process – Incubation).  No one – I repeat – NO ONE – ever got to the top putting out three pages of lines and calling it “done.”

If that’s not how you do it, fine.  Just make sure you do whatever you do - often.  Not doing it too long can rust your process. 

I had one student who always showed up shirt buttoned wrong, hair unkempt.  Shaking from Starbucks and Diet Coke, if he had one page of lines, he had twenty.  And those were just the ones he remembered to bring.

Were they all brilliant?  Not even close. But we went over each one, deciding which had promise, which were fully formed.  Ferreted out wild hairs and direction changes he needed to play with.  Not surprisingly, he always ended up with at least half-dozen truly brilliant lines I wished were mine.

Other students?  Five-six pages, tops.  Did it matter?  Today Mr. Prolific’s book’s full of work that’s won CLIOs, flown him to Cannes, been published in Archive, CA.  Brought home Gold Pencils, London International Awards.  You want it, he has it.  The hottest agency recruiters and headhunters all know his name, his work and an agency willing to bust their budget to hire him.

What else could you want?  The same thing he works so hard for.  He isn’t picturing hot shops in fabulous cities grinding away at 3:00 a.m.  He works for perfection.  For the joy of it.  A true Kamikaze Creative, If it isn’t his best, it isn’t good enough.  In the process, he comes up with the some of the best anyone could do.  And many a good deal better.  

His lines don’t just state the obvious, give the visual a title.  They suck you in.  Speak to the Prospect’s inner needs, desires.  Stop you from turning the page, going on to the next screen or forgetting what they said.  If they’re funny, they also have a message.  If they have a message, you can’t ignore it.

There’s one more technique, but it’s hard to explain. 
Going through a line and coming out the other side.  I’ve never been able to explain it so any sane person can understand, but ad creatives are seldom sane.  Here’s how it works for me.

When I get to the end of one direction, know the direction’s right but haven’t found the genius line, I stare at it.  It’s as if I physically go through it, come out where I see it from behind.  Almost like it’s meaning is backward.  If I’m lucky, I see a new conceptual, almost spiritual direction.  If I’m luckier, I see the exact line I’m looking for.  That’s all I can tell you.  Doing this – however it works – usually takes me that last step from really good to breakout fabulous.

I don’t know if it’s a visual thing, a meditative thing or what.  Like Alice’s looking glass, everything goes topsy-turvy; letters turn into cats and a new thought translation hits.  Maybe perfectly formed.  Maybe the start of another twenty pages.  Those who grok it (and I acknowledge I don’t give much to go on) usually tell me it’s amazing, works like nothing else. 

Go figure.

But that’s how I write headlines. 

Editing Tip:  I’ve done five edits, cut out 300+ words.  It’s still longer than I want, but I think it says what I need to say.  How’d I do it?  Check in next time, editing lines is the next step in writing great headlines.

COMING AS SOON AS POSSIBLE:  Practical things you need to know about headlines and body copy.  Scientific method stuff you shouldn’t wait for experience to teach you.

Wednesday, April 4, 2012

Imagine That!

Just found out this blog has been named a Top One Hundred Advertising Blog.  Amazing.  Thanks for reading - I am pleased, but confused.  I don't promote, it's targeted to advertising students.  Since the ranking is dependent upon (among other things) relevant content, I'm glad I'm doing a good job.  Please tell your friends, your instructors, your Mom (she'll be glad you're not wasting your time online).  Thanks mucho.  Toodles!

Monday, April 2, 2012

Mercury, Google, My Next Post

If you're wondering where the next lesson/installment is, the answer is "almost done."  Retrograde Mercury has been making mincemeat with my schedule (went to Wed. doc appointment on Tues., cancelled Tuesday hair cut thinking it was on Monday, that kind of thing) and I want to apologize.  I'll hopefully finish it up when I get back from Atlanta this weekend, will post it asap.

I'll be in Atlanta to, among other things, speak to the Portfolio Center student body this week.  Their present Copy Director and my former student, Robyn Cohen, invited me and Robyn's not someone I'd turn down.  Am also hoping to connect with some other former students while I'm there, do some business, etc.  I'll be speaking 10 a.m. this Thursday, 4/5/12. Mercury goes Direct that day, so I should be at my best.  If any of you are in Atlanta and want to stop by, please be my guest.  Just say Doreen invited me, say hi when I'm done.  I'm committed to lunch with Robyn and a few of her students after, but if you let me know you're there, perhaps we can schedule something for later in the day (or Friday a.m.) if you'd like to talk, show me some work, etc.

One thing I do want to add:  Google has announced (more or less) that it's finally seen the light and agrees with the approach I've held regarding web writing for as long as there's been web writing.  They will no longer search for SEO key words, will look instead for meaningful, relative, and informative prospect centered copy.

I have refused to do SEO since before it had a name.  If you're looking up words you think Google is looking for, writing Prospect Centered, informative, relative copy is impossible.  If you load up on them, you also break a very important Kamikaze Copy Sin: repeating the same word too closely in a paragraph/piece of copy.  You're also not likely to be able to write in a targeted Language of Concept if you have to tailor your style for words that likely don't have any style at all.  All adds up to poor creative, impossible copy and a less than satisfying prospect experience.

My only question:  What took you guys so long?

All of you who have been fighting this battle with me - and I know there are others out there, because not just a few of you have complained to me about it - how's it feel to have something as all-pervasive and influential as Google say you're right?  Now on to the next great battle in this marvelous, inventive, explorative creative opportunity called the Internet.

One more thing - I am working hard to get my new website, kamikazecreative.com, up and running.  It'll be the new home for my blog (although I may also publish here, still mulling that one) and hopefully will enable me to add a Q&A forum, offer editing lessons on submitted copy (professional and/or student), show produced portfolio samples as examples of my positions, downloads + a few other goodies in the back of my demented and subversive imagination.  I'll let you know when it's up, but for those of you who've asked - I've been working on it.  Mercury's going Direct (see planetaryperceptions.com, Retrograde Mercury button in top left corner) so I'm hopeful as things go back to normal, I can at least put up the first piece of it.

See you in my next post soon. Here.  At kamikazecreative.com asap.  Toodles.

Monday, February 13, 2012

YOU WANNA WRITE COPY? YOU WANNA ART DIRECT IT? What it takes to be a Kamikaze Copywriter, Art Director, Designer (Web and/or Graphic), AE or any other kind of professional creative.


What makes a Kamikaze Copywriter (or any other kind of Kamikaze Creative)?  Insights acquired?  Talent and drive you found in the womb?  Can you study the requirements in school?  Figure it out watching others?  Is it the same for Copywriters, Screen Writers, Novelists, Poets and Performance Artists?  Art Directors, Fine Artists, Interior Decorators and Designers?

I can only share what my years as Copywriter, Creative Director, Life Observationist and Instructor of all things Ad Creative have taught me.

Besides wardrobe, what do Kamikaze Copywriters, Art Directors and Designers have in common?

What you’d expect – and a good bit more. I have a handout describing the Creative Personality.  (If you want a copy, email a request.)  It includes imaginary friends, an offbeat sense of humor, innate sense of people, trends and events, good vocabulary, independent thinking, lack of inhibitions, comfort with disarray, yadda yadda.  It’s quite a list and while all ad creatives don’t have every single trait, they have enough of them to understand each other.

Copywriters are as visual as ADs, GDs and WDs

Even if you can’t draw, you’re drawn to a nice label, original layout, unusual use of space, color.  You may “see” your thoughts rather than “hear” them.   You instinctively understand great art (paintings, sculpture, literature, music, fine crafts, dance, etc.). Graphic balance, color values, how a line should look in a layout seem obvious.  Your innate ability to see things your AD missed, misplaced or made too big make you both loved and hated by those you work with, depending upon how you include them in your process. All these things should come naturally, even if you aren’t aware of it until you start working in creative teams.

If verbal/visual talent alone doesn’t qualify you, what does?

It’s one thing to know how to write well or draw.  Quite another to have an instinct for how words, design and visuals reach and motivate people and events.  You also need the ego/confidence to believe other people see what you want them to, they way you want them to, when you want them to.  If you don’t,  your work will never get approved, produced, win the awards you deserve.

You can be shy, just don’t Present like it

I had a client who let my students present copy as if they worked for him. Everyone learned how it was done; how to discuss/defend their copy, do While You Wait revisions, etc., with a real live client.

One student was so shy, he talked to the floor, his voice cracked, faded and mumbled. His work was good, but I thought he’d never make it in advertising because he’d never be able to present his work like he believed in it. 

His turn with this client was painful to watch. The client took him to task over a few lines, a word here and there.  Stuttering, stammering, sweating bullets, the guy somehow managed to defend his work and make back-and-forth revisions. 

When it was over, he stood up, put out his wet, clammy hand, thanked the client and beamed ear to ear.  “Boy that was fun!” he enthused, “when can I do it again?” 

He never stammered through, flubbed or sweated a presentation again.  He enjoyed it so much, he became one of the best presenters in the class, went to a good agency and was often the go-to creative in new business pitches.

Shyness doesn’t exclude you.  Not being able to present does.

Kamikaze Creatives risk it all with every assignment

As misguided (and dead) as Japanese Kamikaze pilots were, Kamikaze Copywriters and other ad creatives must be willing do what they did.  Put their professional lives on the line to get their best ideas produced. 

Going out on that limb can dangerous enough when it’s your idea.  But if that solution’s not good enough to ask the client to put his/her job is on the line too, you need a better one. 

That’s the concept behind Kamikaze Creative.  Being willing to risk your job on an idea good enough to ask the client to risk her/his job, too. Every time you present, the unexpected smartness and originality of everything you show must put you both out on that limb. 

I once asked a former student (SF Art Director of the Year, One Show regular, you name it he won it; Principal/Founding Partner of an agency everyone in the country wanted to work for) how he got even his most difficult clients to buy work that scared them.  “Every time they send it back,” he said, “we come up with something better.  If good is all they get, sooner or later they have to buy it.”

If you don’t have the courage of his convictions, you’ll never be a Kamikaze Creative.  


You believe deadlines are a challenge, not a death sentence

If the sound of the clock tick, ticking away the time you have to create, produce and deliver scares you, go back to Bard or Hampshire College.  Life is full of difficult deadlines.  Advertising deadlines make life’s due dates look easy. 

We don’t have just one deadline any more than we do one assignment at a time.Miss one, the dominoes may flatten your boss’ enthusiasm for keeping you employed.  Why?  It’s not just your deadline. 

Whenever it's due, you must do the same quality work.  If you don’t, Domino!  The date the AE promised the client, the date the media closes, the broadcast schedule starts, the printer needs final approved files, the site goes live, the event happens.  Miss your deadline once, maybe they’ll forgive you.  But if you can’t learn to consistently deliver, no matter how short the time frame, how heavy your workload, how much sleep you don’t get, you won’t last.

I’ve known creatives who developed love/hate relationships with deadlines, others who saw them as the exciting finale to a very fast race.  Love them, hate them, part of the fun is pulling all nighters when deadlines are cut short, you’re buried, your creative partner is sick. 

It’s part of the drill.  It’s part of the excitement.  If it’s not part of who you are, there’s always an MBA.

Who cares about Ethics?

Advertising is a team sport.  Cheat, steal, slack off.  Lie, make false claims.  This isn’t politics, it’s Advertising.  Burn your AD, they’ll work with someone else.  Burn your client, be prepared to be known as the writer who lost the XYZ account and was never seen again.  Burn your Creative Director, hope your portfolio’s in order.  If the people you work with can’t trust you, if the client feels the same way, you won’t last.  No matter how good you are, sooner or later you’re the one those dominoes flatten.

I had a student with considerable talent who was a snake in the grass.  Adept at presenting someone else’s ideas so you thought they were his, he’d also outright steal.  He was rude and hurtful.  Arrogant is not a strong enough word. The school wanted him gone.  I was more than willing to send him packing. 

He had a good book, not all of it his.  It took two months for one of the best creative shops around to figure out half the work he showed couldn’t be his.  Two short months before clients, AEs, ADs wanted him off their accounts.  He bounced from agency to agency, never lasting long.  With each move, his salary got bigger, sure.  But the number of shops who hadn’t heard about him got smaller.  Eventually, no one wanted his work badly enough to want him. 

To his credit, he did calm down with age, and eventually became palatable enough to get hired again.  But he never reached the heights, never got the respect he could have, should have, if only he wasn’t such a lying, cheating SOB. 

If I have such a great job, how can I still be so hungry?

An idea is never good enough, big enough.  Your work can always be better.  Really good creatives feel that way, no matter how many Gold Pencils clutter their desk.  It’s a hunger to create more, create better.  A feeling the work is never good enough, the editing never done.  If you aren’t driven to perfection, even though you know it’s an imperfect world, an imperfect business, you’ll never be as good as you can be. 

Great ad creatives don’t slow down after their first trip to Cannes, they work harder.  Great copywriters don’t lock into a style once it wins a big award.  If you aren’t constantly pushing, striving for better, more original, more unexpected, you may become an AD or a copywriter.  But you’ll never be a Kamikaze Creative. 

The choice is up to you, but everything I’m going to share with you, all the technical tips and secrets, insights and techniques to come, is predicated upon that hunger.

All that aside, what’s the most important quality for Kamikaze Copywriters?

Good, creative, correct writing isn’t the first thing I look for.  My classes were full of natural, even genetic, talent.   That didn’t always make them Kamikaze Copywriter material.

Except for agency titles, my business cards have always read “Writer/Thinker” or “Writer by Trade/Problem Solver by Inclination”.  That’s what separates Kamikaze Copywriters from those best left to technical writing, journalism, PR or academic Creative Writing programs.  Ad writers are good at solving problems.  We think, therefore we write.

Innate problem solvers grok Kamikaze Creative Strategy on a molecular level. Solving problems is fun and easy.  We don’t stop at the first solution - there are always so many more to come.  We give the uncommon answer.  Creative, original ideas grounded in an instinctive grasp of people, trends and how to fill any creative vacuum.

Creative Strategy gives form and structure to doing what comes naturally.  The Kamikaze Creative Work Plan makes sense to us – whether we see it or not, innate problem solvers already use that process.

No matter how talented a writer you are, if you don’t have natural ability, drive and desire to creatively problem solve, you’re not going to be conceptual enough to be Kamikaze.

What about verbal proficiency and natural born talent? Here’s what I look for:

1.     A writer who doesn’t need modifiers, complex, sophisticated structure or repetition to make a point.
2.     A writer who can flush the extraneous and keep me interested as s/he cuts to the chase.
3.     A writer who thinks in poetry and doesn’t need it to rhyme.  Someone adept at haiku has the kind of poetic talent that makes for great copy.
4.     Writers who recognize how subject matter relates to the idea’s recipient (concept to prospect) – and gets them to see it as plainly as we do.
5.     Writers who love to write without running at the mouth.  Who love editing as much – or more – than the initial rush of words.
6.     Writers with a love of people and an uncanny knack for “knowing” how they’ll react, to what, how, when.
7.     Writers who always seem to know the next trend six months before it hits.

I once had a student so in love with words, so enamored of  flowery structure, I couldn’t teach her a thing. She thought writing was romantic.  Believed whole-heartedly that what can be said in one word must be said in twelve.  I pegged her as a mid-term drop out, but I was wrong.  Since she was past the date of tuition adjustment, she finished the term, then was never heard from again.

A Copywriter I worked with in Houston won the hugely prestigious The Nation’s annual poetry prize.  She could do more with a word than anyone else I’ve known.   Her poetry was spare, visual and visceral.  Did not depend upon nuance or dulling virtuosity. I thought she could rule the copy world, but she saved her brilliance for poetry.  While her copy could be clever, it never transcended.  She had everything but the drive to advertising.

Another student started school writing like a sixth grader.  His structure could confuse the heck out of you, no matter how simple his words.  Naively, wildly original, he took creative risks he never knew he took.  Found elegant, simple solutions to tricky problems.  Other instructors tried to tame him, make his words and ideas conform to prevailing standards.  I pushed him to mix it up, see his words as partner to his very original creative solutions.  The guy could laugh in haiku.  He went on to win every award you want. 

That said, how do I know if I have what it takes?

For one thing, you never take “no” for an answer.  For another, you risk a shot because nothing can discourage or dissuade your hunger and ambition.

If you don’t fit into any of these general Kamikaze Creative or Copywriting niches, don’t give up yet.  Quitting before you give it your best shot, then a better shot, then an one that’s even better, isn’t something Kamikaze Creatives understand.

More truth about Kamikaze Creatives:
1)                     Art Directors, Copywriters, Graphic and Web Designers have more in common than they are different.
2)                     Copywriting is as visual as any of the graphic arts.
3)                     Being a good writer or artist doesn’t mean you were born for Advertising.
4)                     If you don’t like selling, speaking in front of groups and have never laughed when caught in a studied yet spontaneous exaggeration, you may not like it here.
5)                     If you’re not a risk taker, if you can’t get your client to become one too, you can be an ad creative.  But you’ll probably never fly to Cannes at someone else’s expense.
6)                     If you can’t create under deadlines, often many at the same time, forget about the ad biz and stick to art for art’s sake.
7)                     Writing (or doing anything else) in Advertising does not eliminate the need for strong principles and rock solid ethics.
8)                     If you’re not hungry – for ideas, for experience, for fun, fame and even fortune, you may be able to do it.  But you’ll never rise to the top.

Now we have all that out of the way, next post we’ll start learning HOW.

As always, this is (c) Doreen Dvorin/Kamikaze Creative, 2012

Thursday, February 9, 2012

It's coming!

Got busy, but have next post/first of CW series almost done, will post asap.  Thought I'd have it up by now, sorry.  D.

Wednesday, January 11, 2012

KAMIKAZE CREATIVE CRASH COURSE IN COPYWRITING/NOT JUST FOR COPYWRITERS ANYMORE: Lots of important stuff smart Art Directors, Graphic Designers, Web Designers, ACDs, CDs, ECDs, AEs and Clients should know, too.


I’ve been so focused on Kamikaze Creative Strategy, I almost forgot most of you find me seeking advice/wisdom/thoughts/techniques/etc. on writing copy.  Art Directors, Graphic Designers, Web Designers, Account Execs and other non-Copywriters - most of what's to come will make you better at your job. Don't think it’s not for you. 


A big part will be increasing readability – as much about graphic sensibilities as it is about the writing.  Pay attention when I get there. It’ll make your work better. You’ll be a more useful partner to your Copywriter.  As importantly (if not more), you’ll find secret copy stuff that puts “CD” after your name faster.  Some things will be directly transferable to Art Direction/Graphic/Web Design.  Other posts will show you how to help your writer maintain style, edit for proper length, give insights that’ll make your graphics more compelling. 

One of my most popular classes is “Copywriting for Art Directors and Designers.”  A sleeper subject at first glance – ADs, GDs and now WDs think they’ll suffer through without learning anything useful.  A few insights and assignments later, people try to join the class late.  Interestingly, CW for ADs/G/WDs has inspired more than one student to change “majors.” 

Writers will find KCCCCW will do more than make them better.  You'll also get Art Direction for Copywriters.  Not just to make you a better partner and more promotable – like Copywriting for ADs/G/WDs, it’ll arm you with knowledge you can wield in approval/presentation defense.  The goal is to give CWs and ADs/GDs/WDs insights beyond their own specialty (although Crash Course in Copywriting will be heavily skewed toward How to Write Better Copy).  

I’m still working on priorities, order and emphasis. Watch This Space for upcoming posts.  I’ll cover more on Kamikaze Copy Sins, capitalizing on the KCWP, how to write (better) headlines, writers’ block, writing visually, where to start/how to finish, writing for integrated campaigns, the difference between online vs. traditional media copy, editing, style, structure/syntax/yadda yadda, Language of Concept, when/why/how to write what length (long, short, one liners), the copy process/yours/mine/others', lots of goodies obvious, subtle and just between you and me (writing for difficult client approval, presenting to various internal levels, that kind of thing).  I’m even playing with the idea of having you send me troubled copy we can work together online.


Bear with me if I veer into seemingly unrelated territory.  If something current comes up (example: the last few posts on Objective Based Kamikaze Creative Strategy), don’t dismiss it.  What we do for a living is a multi-layered intertwined set of skills applied in ways (teams and groups) that prevent anyone from doing their own job well without contributing to what the rest of the Creative Department is doing.


I’ll post the first piece (still deciding where to begin – copy has no Start Here button) before the end of the month.  Check back.  As always, if there’s something you’d like me to cover, email me and I’ll try to answer, either here or privately. 

NOTE FOR NON-COPYWRITERS:  Don’t get bogged down in minutiae.  Take what you can use, file the rest for when you’re Creative Director.